In a difficult conversation, you restate the other person's position in your own words before you respond to it. What does this actually accomplish?
Объяснение
The mechanism is verification: your restatement is a testable claim about what they meant, and they can confirm or correct it on the spot — which is precisely what a disagreement conducted on a misreading never gets. Option 1 describes the opposite of what a restatement means: repeating a position is not agreeing with it, and treating it as agreement is itself a misunderstanding. Options 2 and 3 may sometimes occur as side effects, but neither is what the step does, and framing it as a concession-extraction tactic misdescribes it as manipulation rather than as a check on comprehension.